Healthcare & taxes

ACA subsidies in 2026: the early retiree's guide to the returning subsidy cliff.

For early retirees, health insurance is often the single biggest budget line between retirement and Medicare. And in 2026, the rules of that game changed significantly: the enhanced premium tax credits that smoothed costs from 2021 through 2025 expired on December 31, 2025, and the old subsidy cliff is back.

If you retired early — or you're planning to — this is the most financially consequential policy detail of your pre-65 years. Here's how the 2026 rules work, why your income is more controllable than you think, and how Roth conversions interact with your health insurance bill.

Quick answer. The ACA's enhanced premium tax credits expired at the end of 2025, bringing back the subsidy cliff: one dollar of income over the threshold (roughly $84,600 MAGI for a two-person household in 2026) wipes out the entire credit, not just the part above the line. In the worked example below, a $25,000 Roth conversion costs $22,000 total between tax and lost credits — so early retirees need to plan conversions and other income around the cliff, not just around tax brackets.

What changed in 2026?

From 2021 through 2025, the American Rescue Plan and Inflation Reduction Act enhanced the ACA's premium tax credits: nobody paid more than 8.5% of income for a benchmark silver plan, and the old 400%-of-poverty income cap was effectively gone.

Those enhancements expired. For 2026, the original ACA structure is back:

KFF's own figures put a finer point on it: the enhanced credits had been saving subsidized enrollees an average of $705 a year, holding their typical annual premium to about $888 — without them, that figure moves back toward $1,593.

The commonly cited 2026 thresholds at 400% FPL:

Household size400% FPL (approx.)
1 person$62,600
2 people$84,600
4 people$128,600

These are the lines that now define your health insurance costs. And unlike in your working years, your income in early retirement is largely your choice — which is both the opportunity and the trap.

How ACA subsidies work: it's all about MAGI

Your premium tax credit is based on Modified Adjusted Gross Income — for ACA purposes, that's your AGI plus tax-exempt interest, non-taxable Social Security benefits, and a few other add-backs. The credit covers the difference between the benchmark silver plan premium in your area and the amount you're expected to contribute based on your income.

The critical insight for early retirees: you control your MAGI by choosing which accounts to draw from. A retiree with $2M who lives on Roth contributions and return-of-principal from a taxable account can show very little MAGI. The same retiree doing large Roth conversions or realizing capital gains can show a lot.

What counts toward ACA MAGI:

What does not count:

Notice the asymmetry: a $50,000 year funded by selling taxable-account stock with $40,000 of basis generates only $10,000 of MAGI. The same $50,000 as a Roth conversion generates $50,000 of MAGI. Same spending, wildly different subsidy outcome.

Worked example: the $25,000 Roth conversion that cost $22,000

Consider a hypothetical couple, ages 60 and 62, both on a marketplace plan. Their benchmark silver plan costs $2,200/month — $26,400/year. (Premiums at 60+ are steep; this is realistic for many markets.)

Their base MAGI is $80,000 — under the ~$84,600 cliff for a two-person household. Under the reverted 2026 formula, a household near 380% of FPL is expected to contribute roughly 9–10% of income toward the benchmark plan, so about $7,600–$8,000. Their premium tax credit covers the rest: roughly $18,500/year.

Now suppose they do a $25,000 Roth conversion — sensible tax planning in isolation, since they're in a low bracket with years before RMDs.

New MAGI: $105,000. That's over the $84,600 cliff. Credit: $0. They now pay the full $26,400.

True cost of that $25,000 conversion:

  • Federal income tax on the conversion (mostly at 12%, some at 22%): roughly $3,500
  • Lost premium tax credits: roughly $18,500
  • Total: roughly $22,000 — on a $25,000 conversion

That's an effective marginal rate near 90%. The conversion wasn't just suboptimal; it was destructive. And here's the painful part: a $4,000 conversion would have kept them at $84,000 — under the cliff, credits intact. Precision is everything.

The reconciliation sting

There's a second trap layered on top. Most people don't pay full premiums and wait for a tax credit — they take advance premium tax credits during the year, based on estimated income, and reconcile at tax time.

If your actual MAGI ends up above 400% FPL, you repay the entire advance credit. There is no partial credit for being close. And starting in 2026, the repayment caps that used to limit how much excess advance credit lower-income households had to pay back have been removed — raising the downside of underestimating your income.

A December surprise — a mutual fund capital gain distribution, a bigger-than-expected freelance payment, a Roth conversion you forgot to count — can turn into a five-figure tax bill in April. Track MAGI during the year, not after it.

Strategies for the pre-65 years

When does the math favor skipping subsidies?

Honest nuance: maximizing ACA credits isn't always the right goal. If you have a very large traditional IRA balance and RMDs at 75 will push you into the 32% bracket, the lifetime value of big early conversions can exceed a decade of subsidies. A $20,000/year credit for 8 years is $160,000; avoiding 32% tax on $1M+ of RMDs can be worth more.

The right question isn't "how do I keep my subsidies?" It's "which strategy leaves me wealthier after tax over my whole retirement?" That requires modeling both paths — subsidies kept versus conversions done — over decades, not vibes.

How Runway models ACA credits alongside conversions

This is precisely the interaction that's hardest to get right by hand: every conversion dollar simultaneously changes your income tax, your ACA credit, your future RMDs, and (two years later) your IRMAA. Optimizing any one of them in isolation gives the wrong answer.

Runway Pro models ACA premium tax credits year by year as part of your plan — including the 400% FPL cliff — so the Roth conversion optimizer evaluates each conversion level net of lost subsidies. The bracket-by-bracket comparison shows you the true all-in cost: income tax plus foregone credits. In many pre-65 plans, the optimizer correctly recommends little or no conversion during ACA years and heavier conversions after 65 — and shows you the dollar value of that sequencing.

You can start in the free tier (no card required): Monte Carlo simulation, the 30-year projection table, withdrawal sequencing, and Social Security claiming guidance. If the interplay of conversions, credits, and IRMAA looks like it matters for your plan, Pro is $99/year with a 7-day free trial. Or start simpler: our free Roth conversion calculator (no signup) shows the basic now-vs-later tradeoff in under a minute.

The bottom line

  1. The enhanced ACA subsidies expired end of 2025; the 400% FPL cliff is back for 2026 (~$62,600 single, ~$84,600 couple).
  2. Above the cliff, credits go to zero — a $1-over miss can cost $15,000–$25,000/year.
  3. Roth conversions count fully toward ACA MAGI; Roth contribution withdrawals and taxable-account basis do not.
  4. During ACA years, precision beats ambition: stay under the cliff with a buffer, or defer conversions until Medicare.
  5. Reconcile carefully — advance credits above the cliff must be repaid in full.
Runway content is educational only and is not financial, tax, or legal advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

Model your pre-65 years. See how ACA credits, Roth conversions, and RMDs interact in your own plan — free to start, no credit card required.

Try the planner